Skip to main content

On consuming "content" voraciously.

Staying on top of trends and yet innovating beyond them.


I spend a good chunk of my week reading about all things advertising and marketing.

What the latest campaigns are.

What worked.

What didn't.

Analyses of what worked and why (as I've written about before).

Best practice case studies.

But ultimately, to paraphrase (and slightly bowdlerize) Karl Marx on Feuerbach, looking at what's been done before only gets you so far.

That's why for me it's so important to go beyond "the industry."

Now I know I easily read as pretentious.

I like museums and the opera. I read books galore, watch foreign and art house films, and (mostly pre-child) went to obscurish theater performances.

But at the same time – I consume "content" (images, words, visuals, experiences) voraciously and indiscriminately. I never want to be that person who says "should I know who that is" (or something similarly dismissive) on hearing a celebrity (and if I don't know who they are, I'll look them up online).

So to me, everything needs to be fair game.

Brands and publishers on Snapchat.

TV guides.

Children's books (I'm a big fan of picture books when they're done well – favorites include Jon Klassen and Mini Grey).

Why?

It's because if I don't know what people actually like, I wouldn't be able to do what I do.

I'm not a big fan of Michael Moore (the sensationalism; the lies purporting to be in the service of truth), but his essay back in July 2016 on why Trump would win the election proved correct. In a post-election interview with Vulture he explained:
I think more people on the left should pay attention to what America watches. And sometimes it's entertaining. Kaitlyn [on The Bachelorette], everyone thought she was going to pick Nick. She went with Shawn. And the whole country's coming apart: What the hell is she doing? Clearly Nick was the winner! Shit happens in this country. It's a large country with lots of different kinds of people. And you can choose to live in the country, or live in your bubble.

Now Moore never actually explains how watching popularist shows could give the liberal elite helpful insights into the general American mindset beyond "the bubble." Still, I think his point is similar to what Dave Trott said in his post "The Naked Truth":
Before we start to speak we must find out what our audience needs to hear.

Then we must talk to them in their language.

 

Otherwise we’re just talking to ourselves.

And it's good for me to go outside my comfort zone. I've watched the odd episode of Keeping Up With The Kardashians in the gym and initially, the staged artificiality bored me (why would I care about their manufactured drama). Objectively speaking, shows like X Factor and The Great British Bake Off don't give me much at all.

But from the point of "what appeals to other people about this – why is this so popular? What instincts does this speak to, and what appetites does it sate (or further fuel)" – from that perspective, these shows are fascinating.

So I continue to consume everything, in the hopes that it will inspire something new.

As for how this relates to what I've said before about how knowledge constrains – it still holds true. Because there is always comes a point when you have to cast aside what you've learned and what you already know and move beyond it.

Comments

Post a comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading Raj Patel’s “The Value of Nothing” in an advertising context.

The more I read about the theory of advertising (which is plenty, thanks to my upcoming IPA Eff Test), the more it seems just inextricably linked to other disciplines.
Psychology and sociology are pretty much a given – the better we understand how people’s minds and social structures work, the better we can sell to them. But there’s also a huge economic dimension to advertising.
Specifically, so much of advertising relates to the process of value creation. Though my Comparative Literature course included ample Marx, Engels, Veblen, and Benjamin, it’s a concept that I’m still working to fully understand.
That’s why I was very happy to come across Raj Patel’s The Value of Nothing. At its core, it’s a fundamental examination of why things cost what they do – though it also goes far beyond that as the subtitle, “How to reshape market society and redefine democracy,” suggests.
One of the best parts is where Patel explains why “a burger grown from beef raised on clear-cut forest should really c…
Post a comment
Read more

Digested Read: How (Not) To Plan, Section 1.

New year = new ventures – in my case, this includes a series of digested reads, with a focus on ad strategy books. I'm kicking it off with the APG's How (Not) To Plan.

Firstly: the book is already a digested read, so this will be the super-distilled version. I'll tackle it section by section.

Section 1 is all about Setting Objectives.
Introduction
"Effective communication starts with agreeing with your clients what it's supposed to do. [O]ften, this stage is rushed, fudged, based on flawed thinking or skipped altogether."
1.1 How (Not) To Make a Plan
The authors talk about how "marketing objectives [...] have lost their grip on reality." However, "there is evidence from the IPA Databank that better objective setting leads to more effective campaigns. Best practice is to identify exactly what business results you want. And exactly what you need people to think, feel, and do to deliver those results." Also? "A campaign can't deliver unles…
Post a comment
Read more

On The Rising Ubiquity of Brackets.

Building on Tom Roach's brilliant takedown of the "sea of sameness" in the marketing and advertising industry, I'm making more of an effort to document and comment on trends (especially digital ones) that suddenly seem to be everywhere. Today's subject: brackets.

If you're US-based, you're less likely to be surprised at why I'm talking about brackets at this particular point. After all, we're right in the midst of March Madness - bracket season as per Google trends, not just in the States...



But around the world.



Little as I care about the NCAA (or sports in general), I do care about the cultural zeitgeist - which at the moment is pretty bracket heavy.

Especially on social.

(Brief digression because my British colleagues' reactions to the term "brackets" - and the decidedly March-agnostic search interest around brackets here - made it amply clear that this hasn't really entered the British national consciousness.



As per Wikipedia's…
Post a comment
Read more