Skip to main content

On the two types (or are there?) of advertising.

I see advertising as (roughly) split into two.

On the one hand, we have PPCish ads – things of ugly and meaningless clickbait noise that my brain basically blends out. Not inspirational, not aspirational.

Like what's featured at the top of my Gmail 'Promotions' tab.


Lest I sound too dismissive: I'm actually studying this type of advertising at the moment. These ads are obviously effective, and if something can make our clients money (and by extension the business and thus myself money) it would be incredibly short-sighted of me to ignore it just because it doesn't appeal to me personally.

And there's definitely a "creativity within restraint" process involved in creasing the most effective ads given the incredibly restricted character limit.

Then there's the other hand.

Because then there are those ads which – both visually and in terms of copy – are things of pure beauty, and (often) driven by so much intelligence. Those ads which I at least would consider art. (Not to get into the whole art vs. advertising debate – that's a whole different post.)

Like just look at this vintage Air France travel poster ad (illustrated by P. Baudouin, 1947; image embedded from here).


(Note: I spent about an hour looking at pretty ads and choosing a representative was so, so hard...especially when looking at the London Transport Museum's collection of old ads.)

But then I thought: what do aesthetically appealing promoted posts fall under – like if these brand-driven Facebook posts were featured as promoted content? Aesthetically appealing YouTube InDisplay ads? Is advertising a spectrum rather than a dichotomy, and all these ads are ultimately sales-driven permutations of the same underlying concept?

That's the part I'm still trying to work out.


Popular posts from this blog

Reading Raj Patel’s “The Value of Nothing” in an advertising context.

The more I read about the theory of advertising (which is plenty, thanks to my upcoming IPA Eff Test), the more it seems just inextricably linked to other disciplines.
Psychology and sociology are pretty much a given – the better we understand how people’s minds and social structures work, the better we can sell to them. But there’s also a huge economic dimension to advertising.
Specifically, so much of advertising relates to the process of value creation. Though my Comparative Literature course included ample Marx, Engels, Veblen, and Benjamin, it’s a concept that I’m still working to fully understand.
That’s why I was very happy to come across Raj Patel’s The Value of Nothing. At its core, it’s a fundamental examination of why things cost what they do – though it also goes far beyond that as the subtitle, “How to reshape market society and redefine democracy,” suggests.
One of the best parts is where Patel explains why “a burger grown from beef raised on clear-cut forest should really c…

Digested Read: How (Not) To Plan, Section 1.

New year = new ventures – in my case, this includes a series of digested reads, with a focus on ad strategy books. I'm kicking it off with the APG's How (Not) To Plan.

Firstly: the book is already a digested read, so this will be the super-distilled version. I'll tackle it section by section.

Section 1 is all about Setting Objectives.
"Effective communication starts with agreeing with your clients what it's supposed to do. [O]ften, this stage is rushed, fudged, based on flawed thinking or skipped altogether."
1.1 How (Not) To Make a Plan
The authors talk about how "marketing objectives [...] have lost their grip on reality." However, "there is evidence from the IPA Databank that better objective setting leads to more effective campaigns. Best practice is to identify exactly what business results you want. And exactly what you need people to think, feel, and do to deliver those results." Also? "A campaign can't deliver unles…

On The Rising Ubiquity of Brackets.

Building on Tom Roach's brilliant takedown of the "sea of sameness" in the marketing and advertising industry, I'm making more of an effort to document and comment on trends (especially digital ones) that suddenly seem to be everywhere. Today's subject: brackets.

If you're US-based, you're less likely to be surprised at why I'm talking about brackets at this particular point. After all, we're right in the midst of March Madness - bracket season as per Google trends, not just in the States...

But around the world.

Little as I care about the NCAA (or sports in general), I do care about the cultural zeitgeist - which at the moment is pretty bracket heavy.

Especially on social.

(Brief digression because my British colleagues' reactions to the term "brackets" - and the decidedly March-agnostic search interest around brackets here - made it amply clear that this hasn't really entered the British national consciousness.

As per Wikipedia's…